Ya can't win 'em all...
Jan. 6th, 2009 06:37 pmKind of a cruddy review of the Electret Quintet, part one:
Can't complain though. I am grateful to have someone listen critically and say something, anything!
Sure it's kinda sad to have someone get down on what you've done, but that's what you put yourself in for when you submit something to critique.
I am a little surprised that the same reviewer disliked this one and did like "Fine Failures" which is a.) similar in style, b.) longer in length by thirty minutes and c.) I personally felt weird about, in that the pieces weren't very strong.
In this case I don't feel all that bad because his critiques are actually pretty accurate... this IS kind of an improvisatory work in some senses, it's exploratory and experimental in the real sense, I'm really screwing around trying to find out what works, and showing this to everyone as it happens. I also think the work treads a dangerous line between "beat" music and "experimental" music, a grey area that might leave fans of either genre completely cold.
I also don't think the series really gels until the third part.
BUT, I don't mean to complain or protest... I really do appreciate the review, I appreciate that he took the time to really listen in order to give a review that's honest. The bad review also resulted in a lot of website hits, so I almost think there's not really such a thing as a "bad" review anyway.
C. REIDER - THE ELECTRET QUINTET (PART ONE) (MP3 by Vuzh Music)
Of course we learned to appreciate the work of C. Reider as one of those drone meisters with lots of online releases. Here however he seems to be moving into a different direction. This is part one of a series of five, dealing with 'experimental explorations of the textures and sounds of analogue drum machines'. Two drum machines are used here, the Roland TR-808 and the Roland TR-727. There are fed through sound effects, computers perhaps and still operate in a rhythmic manner, although Reider doesn't want to classify his material as 'industrial, IDM, minimal-techno and noiseambient'. I must admit I had a hard time with this. None of the five tracks here worked very well. It seemed to me that Reider more or less freely improvised on his drum machine, and let the sounds slip into delay and reverb as well as some other sound effects, but none of the tracks were interesting enough to be played again. There is a strong lack of tension and structure in these pieces and it marches on end, even when the pieces aren't very long. I sense there is more to this, and Reider hasn't taken the material to its full capacity yet. Very close to a 'start' and very far away from a 'finish'. (FdW)
Can't complain though. I am grateful to have someone listen critically and say something, anything!
Sure it's kinda sad to have someone get down on what you've done, but that's what you put yourself in for when you submit something to critique.
I am a little surprised that the same reviewer disliked this one and did like "Fine Failures" which is a.) similar in style, b.) longer in length by thirty minutes and c.) I personally felt weird about, in that the pieces weren't very strong.
In this case I don't feel all that bad because his critiques are actually pretty accurate... this IS kind of an improvisatory work in some senses, it's exploratory and experimental in the real sense, I'm really screwing around trying to find out what works, and showing this to everyone as it happens. I also think the work treads a dangerous line between "beat" music and "experimental" music, a grey area that might leave fans of either genre completely cold.
I also don't think the series really gels until the third part.
BUT, I don't mean to complain or protest... I really do appreciate the review, I appreciate that he took the time to really listen in order to give a review that's honest. The bad review also resulted in a lot of website hits, so I almost think there's not really such a thing as a "bad" review anyway.